Science suggests slow weight loss might be less effective

Yesterday, I blogged about fad diets and whether or not they truly help people lose weight.

Today, scientists say people who lose weight quicker are actually more likely to keep the weight off over the long run than those who take their time and lose weight over time.

According to this Reuters article, scientists say it doesn't matter how much weight is initially lost as much as when and how quickly it is lost. The scientists examined data from over 1,000 obese participants.

All of the participants went on diets and the scientists grouped them based on how quickly they lost their weight, evaluating all participants one year later. What they found was that there was no significant difference in the amount of weight that was kept off by the people who took their time.

Still, doctors are not encouraging everyone to go out and radically lose as much weight as they can. One to two lbs. per week is the most they recommend.

What do YOU think? Does losing weight slower help or hurt your efforts to keep it off longer?












posted @ Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:33 PM

Print

Comments on this entry:

# re: Science suggests slow weight loss might be less effective

Left by CD at 7/15/2010 9:38 PM
Gravatar
I think slower is better and safer. Take a look at the past contestants of the Biggest Loser. Many of them have regained the weight

# re: Science suggests slow weight loss might be less effective

Left by Dawn18 at 7/15/2010 10:40 PM
Gravatar
I think the reason people might go for speedy weight loss is that the results are attained faster. It gives more of a mental boost. However, most fad diets aren't healthy. I don't think it matters how you diet though in the long run when it comes to maintaining. If one eats too much and doesn't maintain the weight will come back.

# re: Science suggests slow weight loss might be less effective

Left by Heather at 7/15/2010 10:49 PM
Gravatar
Really? I have always heard the opposite, that slow weight loss is sustained and kept off instead of quick weight loss....even my doctor told me that!
I think I started this in Summer 2008 and started at 280+ and now I am 170. I have been able to keep it off so far! It has slowed down, and I really wanted to be around 150 and I know I still have "fat" to lose...but have still been able to maintain it so far...

# re: Science suggests slow weight loss might be less effective

Left by Dixie at 7/16/2010 4:07 PM
Gravatar
I've lost weight the slow way, and I've lost weight very quickly. Getting the weight off isn't the hard part. Keeping it off is! Fast or slow, if you don't consistently follow a healthy diet, you will gain all the weight back...usually plus a few. Every single time I have gained weight, it has been because I have fallen back into bad eating habits. I don't think it had anything to do with how fast or how slow I lost the weight. I know several people who have lost weight and maintained it for years. Some of them did it quickly some not. What it all comes down to is changing your attitude about food and recognizing just how much you really need to be eating to maintain the weight you desire. Since my experience has taught me that it really doesn't matter how fast or slow I lose the weight, as long as I continue to follow a healthy diet afterward...I am completely cool with getting the weight off quickly through healthy diet and exercise. Taking months to lose a few pounds just doesn't motivate me at all. But that's just me :)

# re: Science suggests slow weight loss might be less effective

Left by wilderness program at 7/19/2010 1:22 AM
Gravatar
Its a funny world, while many of us are trying to find ways to reduce weight there are quite a few people who suffer from excessive weight loss and therefore do not have good health. Though the number of such people are far less compared to those with excess weight issues there are programs that can help such people address this problem. If you teen aged child is suffering from eating disorder then a wilderness program can be looked upon as a means of cure.

Your comment:



 (will not be displayed)


 
 
 
Please add 5 and 8 and type the answer here:
 

Live Comment Preview: